Hot News

首頁 / 雜誌 / 民主與治理 / 201402 (1:1期) / 橘淮為枳:公共服務動機指標適用性的分析
  • 出版單位:國立中正大學政治學系
中文篇名

橘淮為枳:公共服務動機指標適用性的分析 免費試閱

英文篇名

An Empirical Examination of the Applicability of PSM Scale in Taiwan

作者

孫同文許耿銘

中文摘要

近來學者進行公共服務動機研究,多係引用外國學者所設計的問卷與指標項目。以當今較為常見Perry 與Wise 所建構的指標而言,不同論者曾因應國情、文化等因素,據以增修為不同態樣的公共服務動機問卷。若希冀運用於臺灣,除需考量不同背景因素的差異之外,還需克服相關詞彙的翻譯問題及受測者對指標項目的瞭解程度。
因此,本研究企圖以Perry 建構的指標為核心,彙整目前各種不同版本的指標項目;繼之將其設計為問卷,透過公務人員的填寫,分析上開各種指標之信度與效度。根據本研究的結果,Perry 原始的四構面及24 個題項量表的跨文化適用性值得質疑,而學者所提出的修正題項與原始題項之間的替代性不高,僅能代表同一概念的不同面向,絕非可以彼此替代。

英文摘要

Recently, many Taiwan public administration scholars are interested in testing the theory of Public Service Motivation (PSM), which is provided by Perry and Wise, by applying PSM scale locally. The scale was originally developed by Perry in 1996 and has been extensively applied in many countries by many different scholars. They have argued that the scale is actually contextual and cultural bounded. Thus, its applications have to consider not only the above mentioned factors, but also the potential problems in translation. These scholars have proposed many revisions to improve the validity of the original scale.
This study proposes to examine the applicability of PSM scale in Taiwan. Survey questions designed to revise Perry’s PSM scale are collected and factor analyzed together with the original 24-items on the basis of the four dimensions which define and construct the PSM scale. Research results indicate that the applicability of PSM in Taiwan is questionable, and many proposed revisions are measuring different dimensions of the PSM concept. That is, they can only represent different aspects of the same concept.

關鍵詞

公共服務動機公共服務動機量表公務人員因素分析public service motivationPSM scalecivil servantfactor analysis

刊名

民主與治理

期數

201402 (1:1期)

起訖頁

033-052

出版單位

國立中正大學政治學系

DOI

10.3966/2311505X2014020101002  複製DOI   DOI查詢

QRCode

上一篇

深耕地方災害防救網絡治理能力:協力與培力策略分析

下一篇

論轉型正義與臺灣行政國正當性的重生