Hot News
- 出版單位：東吳大學社會系；輔仁大學社會系；世新大學社會心理學系
| 中文篇名 |
從認知觀點看現代羌族的誕生 免費試閱 | |
|---|---|---|
| 英文篇名 |
The Birth of Modern Qiang-People: From Cognitive Perspective | |
| 作者 | ||
| 中文摘要 |
族群理論中，Rogers Brubaker的認知觀點雖未受到足夠的重視，但卻有許多足堪借鏡之處。因此本研究舉出王明珂的「邊緣理論」作為檢討的對象，將焦點由「族群實體」轉向「族群性」來觀察族群現象，嘗試以新方法整合不同觀點之間的爭辯。 | |
| 英文摘要 |
From Rogers Brubaker’s theoretical concepts, this paper will review Ming-Ke Wang’s “border study” of the Qiang-people. Brubaker’s cognitive perspective on ethnic studies is an approach which has not been paid enough attention to, but I argue that it can bring much benefit to the border studies. To integrate primordial, instrumental, as well as the constructionist point of views, here we choose to focus on “ethnicity” rather than on the “ethnic group”. I further illustrate that the emergence of the so-called “border ethnic groups” can be strongly contingent. Yet previous studies using “border approach” and the prevalent theories have paid most attention on the issue of ethnic boundary-making, so they have overlooked the phenomenon of assimilation inclination. On the foundation of cognitive perspective, primordial history does not necessarily contradict with constructionism. Indeed, Brubaker’s cognitive perspective still has its constraint. If neurobiology cannot explicit the mechanisms of how human cognition is constructed, it is hard to take Brubaker’s method as an alternative to prevalent theories. This paper proposes that such approach should be consolidated with other sociological theories, such as Luhmann’s system theory, to improve its implication on the cognitive perspective and ethnic studies in the future. | |
| 關鍵詞 |
羌族、根基歷史、族群、族群性、認知觀點、the Qiang、primordial history、ethnic group、ethnicity、cognitive perspective | |
| 刊名 | ||
| 期數 | ||
| 起訖頁 |
153-186 | |
| 出版單位 |
東吳大學社會系；輔仁大學社會系；世新大學社會心理學系 | |
| DOI | ||
| QRCode |
| |
| 上一篇 |
